Skip to main content

#TheEncounter


Encounter... 
The meaning of the word as we use in India is unique. The word assumed it's new meaning in the late-1960s and acquired a unique place in our vocabulary by the time of Emergency.
It was the time of the Naxalbari movement in north Bengal turning violent and entering large parts of urban areas in the state. Even scholars and professionals were supporting a fledgling group of so-called Communists who had broken out of the Left parties, accusing the latter of "compromising with a cause" by following Parliamentary Democracy. 
"Power flows from the barrel of a gun," they quoted, conveniently ignoring the fact that if so, the state is many times more powerful. They made handful of poor villagers take on posse of rifle-toting police with bows and arrows. All in the name of "revolution"! 


Oblivious to logic, students on (then) Calcutta streets chanted, "China's chairman is our chairman". It was romantic to be called a Naxal or a Maoist. They considered themselves as unassailable as the Rambo, though the film was to be made a decade later. 
The jails were getting overcrowded, mostly with young zealots. Thus, in order to lessen their load, police would rough them overnight, let them suffer the next day, then just dump them in fields or roads. Some were let out of police vans and told to run. To be shot like animals of prey.
The news next day would say "Killed In Encounter"... It implied an armed combat with certain assailants who could not be overpowered and were thus eliminated in self defence.
The readers would sigh and turn to the next coloumn...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Colour

The Queen of Hearts was sad. This one had a good heart. So she was sad because the only thing The Prince wanted to do was attend The Mad Hatter’s Party. He had no interest in either playing croquet or getting anyone’s head offed! So The Queen of Hearts sought the advice of her courtesans. A few told her to leave The Prince at The Mad Hatter’s. Most had their heads offed! However, the majority of those present and voting advised her to anoint him King. They said that he will like a new Party; a Party much, more, bigger than The Mad Hatter’s. Unknown to them, heads were getting offed by themselves. The heads happily got offed voluntarily and bobbed and rolled to join The Cheshire Cat on his tree. The grin of The Cheshire Cat was getting bigger and broader. And even when you could not see The Cheshire Cat at all, you could always see the grin! Now The Prince was The King. He played croquet where the balls were live hedgehogs, the mallets live flamingoes, and the cou...

How Beautiful #OurValley #Kashmir

March 1979, my first visit to Srinagar. We took a train from Patna to Jammu, via Delhi. From Jammu, a bus ride to Srinagar… through the Jawahar Tunnel, around ‘Khooni Naala’ – longingly eyeing cricket bats lined on road-sides – all the time cracking walnut shells, popping in mouth the kernel. Had ‘pink tea’ for the first time at a place 60km before Srinagar – called Anantnag… ! Three days in Srinagar never enough; Dal Lake, the boat ride around Char Chinar, the long climb to Shankaracharya Temple, Chasma Shahi, Shalimar Bagh, Nishat Bagh. On yes, I also remember a sound-and-music presentation at Mughal Garden … Breathtaking! And two days never ever enough to explore Kashmir Valley; Tobagganing at Khilanmarg, snowball-fights at Sonmarg, marveling the Lidder River in Pahalgam… Picturesque! And shopping; carpets, knick-knacks made of walnut wood… my mother bargaining in a shop in the overcrowded market at Lal Chowk… She proudly held up the trophy afterwards – a white ru...

May The #Media Question?

(Pic courtesy: Gopal Dutt Sharma) In India, it may. But many a times it cannot. This despite the fact that media -- especially TV news -- is said to be self-regulatory. Take the example of a government ban on two Malayalam (Kerala) news channels over their coverage of violence in Delhi. The 48-hour embargo, imposed on February 6 was however revoked the next day following “representation” from the channels, reported news outlets. The order reportedly included… "Channel's reporting on Delhi violence seems to be biased as it is deliberately focusing on the vandalism of CAA supporters... It also questions RSS and alleges Delhi Police inaction. Channel seems to be critical towards Delhi Police and RSS…". (Pic courtesy: Gopal Dutt Sharma) If so, is this an official statement on who, or what the media cannot or should not "criticize"? Not the first time Indian media critical of the government of the day was “banned”. It was perhaps wors...